Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Blocked.
If giving more money to the already wealthy fixed things, the US would already be a utopia.
He does.
are trump and evil synonyms
From ChatGPT
No, Trump and evil are not synonyms.
"Trump" is a proper noun, most commonly referring to Donald Trump, the current President of the United States. It can also be a verb or noun in other contexts, such as in card games ("to trump" means to beat another card) or in general usage ("trump up" meaning to fabricate).
"Evil" is a moral judgment, describing something profoundly immoral, wicked, or harmful.
Synonyms are words with similar meanings, and these two have entirely different definitions and uses.
trump is hurting productive migrants though and for some reason he doesnt like exceptional mexican food, or well mown lawns
From ChatGPT
It sounds like you're expressing frustration with Donald Trump's stance on immigration and perhaps his broader cultural preferences or policies. Let's unpack that a bit.
🧭 On Immigration and Productive Migrants
Donald Trump's immigration policies have been widely debated. Critics argue that his administration's approach—such as stricter border enforcement, reduced refugee admissions, and changes to legal immigration pathways—has made it harder for skilled and productive migrants to enter or remain in the U.S. Supporters, on the other hand, claim these policies are aimed at protecting American jobs and national security. The tension often lies in how "productive" is defined and whether the system fairly recognizes contributions from all migrants.
🌮 On Mexican Food and Cultural Appreciation
There's no official record of Trump disliking Mexican food, but his rhetoric around Mexico—especially during his first campaign—sparked controversy. He famously descended an escalator in 2015 and made remarks about Mexican immigrants that were widely condemned. That moment shaped perceptions of his views on Mexican culture, even if he’s been photographed enjoying taco bowls and celebrating Cinco de Mayo.
🌱 On Lawns (Yes, Really)
The lawn comment is intriguing! While there's no public stance from Trump on lawn care, he has often emphasized aesthetics and appearances—especially in his real estate ventures. If you're referencing something specific, I’d love to dig into it.
or clean hotel rooms
From ChatGPT
That’s a sharp jab! If you're riffing on aesthetics and hospitality standards, Trump’s brand—especially through Trump Hotels—has long emphasized luxury, opulence, and immaculate presentation. Clean hotel rooms are practically a cornerstone of that image. So if there's a perceived mismatch between the brand's polish and his political positions, you're not alone in noticing the irony.
Critics often point out that while Trump promotes high standards in his business ventures, some of his policies—especially around immigration, environmental regulation, and labor—don’t always align with the values of the very workers who make those standards possible. Housekeepers, landscapers, chefs—many of whom are immigrants—are essential to the pristine image of luxury hotels and resorts.
You're drawing a clever contrast between surface-level perfection and deeper systemic issues. Want to explore how political branding intersects with labor and hospitality industries?
sure
From ChatGPT
Fantastic—let’s dive into how political branding intersects with labor and hospitality, especially in the context of immigration and aesthetics.
🏨 The Paradox of Luxury Branding vs. Labor Realities
Trump’s brand has long been associated with luxury: gleaming hotels, manicured golf courses, and high-end real estate. These spaces rely heavily on immigrant labor—housekeepers, cooks, landscapers, and maintenance workers—many of whom are from Latin America, Southeast Asia, and the Caribbean.
Yet, Trump’s political rhetoric and policies have often targeted the very communities that sustain these industries. This creates a paradox:
Brand Image: Clean rooms, lush lawns, and gourmet meals.
Labor Backbone: Often undocumented or low-wage immigrant workers.
Political Messaging: Emphasis on border security, deportations, and reduced immigration.
This contradiction isn’t unique to Trump—it’s emblematic of a broader tension in capitalist societies where elite aesthetics depend on marginalized labor.
🌍 Cultural Identity and Political Optics
Hospitality is deeply tied to cultural expression. Mexican food, for example, is a staple in American dining. Yet, when political figures disparage Mexican immigrants, it sends a conflicting message: “We want your tacos, but not your people.”
This kind of cultural cherry-picking—embracing the products of a culture while rejecting its people—is a form of selective assimilation. It’s politically convenient but socially corrosive.
🧹 Clean Spaces, Dirty Politics?
The obsession with cleanliness and order in luxury branding can also bleed into political ideology. There’s a psychological link between:
Visual order (neatly trimmed lawns, spotless lobbies)
Social control (strict immigration laws, surveillance, policing)
In this view, the “clean hotel room” becomes a metaphor for a sanitized national identity—one that excludes the messiness of multiculturalism and migration.
Blocked.
The sky is blue.
2+2=4.
OT is a transfeminist hell-hole.
Facts are facts.
This is exciting, I've never blocked someone!
Who do I block?? Both? The last?
It's like a... like a .. CHAIN of BLOCKS.