All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details
[REDACTED] New Epstein files might as well have not been released if they're going to be in this condition
< >
Showing 1-15 of 22 comments
Uncle Sam 27 Sep @ 11:32pm 
Originally posted by Rain :):
[REDACTED] New Epstein files might as well have not been released if they're going to be in this condition
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/26/democrats-jeffrey-epstein-documents

https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/democrats-oversight.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/epstein-production-3rd-tranch_456.pdf

What a disgusting '♥♥♥♥ you' to any competent person with an IQ above that of a carpet
Well that's the corporate upper echelon, the lobbyist and more amoral unethical & criminal soulless ghouls, keeping their employees in check via their blackmail operations :steamfacepalm:

Still i didn't think they were going to be this blatant about it. :lunar2019deadpanpig:

Thanks for the info & links @OP :steamthumbsup:
First time?

These have half as many redactions as most FOIA documents :steamhappy:
Ulfrinn 28 Sep @ 12:00am 
So, they released the documents and you're still not happy? Well, why not?
Rain :) 28 Sep @ 12:03am 
Originally posted by Ulfrinn:
So, they released the documents and you're still not happy? Well, why not?

Originally posted by Rain :):
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/26/democrats-jeffrey-epstein-documents

https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/democrats-oversight.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/epstein-production-3rd-tranch_456.pdf

What a disgusting '♥♥♥♥ you' to any competent person with an IQ above that of a carpet

I suppose you didn't meet the criteria

This is a conversation for people who actually want to see pedophiles convicted, Ulfrinn

You've made your maga-cult stance very clear; the Dear Leader would never be on such a list
Dusty 28 Sep @ 12:27am 
Originally posted by Ulfrinn:
So, they released the documents and you're still not happy? Well, why not?

They do it for free
Originally posted by OoOoOoooOOoOoorgle:
First time?

These have half as many redactions as most FOIA documents :steamhappy:
Yep lol :steamlaughcry:
What do you expect? It includes probably all of Hollywood and most politicians. It's very likely the kind of thing people would overthrow the royalty for if they knew and weren't already victims of MK Ultra.
$2 Hero 28 Sep @ 8:52pm 
cliffs man please i dont want to click and read that ♥♥♥♥
kbiz 28 Sep @ 8:59pm 
Anything juicy in there?
Ulfrinn 28 Sep @ 9:05pm 
Originally posted by Rain :):
Originally posted by Ulfrinn:
So, they released the documents and you're still not happy? Well, why not?

Originally posted by Rain :):
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/26/democrats-jeffrey-epstein-documents

https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/democrats-oversight.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/epstein-production-3rd-tranch_456.pdf

What a disgusting '♥♥♥♥ you' to any competent person with an IQ above that of a carpet

I suppose you didn't meet the criteria

This is a conversation for people who actually want to see pedophiles convicted, Ulfrinn

You've made your maga-cult stance very clear; the Dear Leader would never be on such a list

You don't want to see pedophiles convicted, you want to see Trump labeled as one. Which is why you people ignore all evidence to the contrary in a desperate hope the Epstein files will have what you so desperately want. And when they don't, suddenly they're not the REAL documents.
Rain :) 28 Sep @ 9:12pm 
Originally posted by Ulfrinn:
Originally posted by Rain :):



I suppose you didn't meet the criteria

This is a conversation for people who actually want to see pedophiles convicted, Ulfrinn

You've made your maga-cult stance very clear; the Dear Leader would never be on such a list

You don't want to see pedophiles convicted, you want to see Trump labeled as one. Which is why you people ignore all evidence to the contrary in a desperate hope the Epstein files will have what you so desperately want. And when they don't, suddenly they're not the REAL documents.

Is Trump a convicted felon?
Originally posted by Ulfrinn:
Originally posted by Rain :):



I suppose you didn't meet the criteria

This is a conversation for people who actually want to see pedophiles convicted, Ulfrinn

You've made your maga-cult stance very clear; the Dear Leader would never be on such a list

You don't want to see pedophiles convicted, you want to see Trump labeled as one. Which is why you people ignore all evidence to the contrary in a desperate hope the Epstein files will have what you so desperately want. And when they don't, suddenly they're not the REAL documents.
See that's what I don't understand. Wouldn't they like Trump if he was labeled as a pedo? I mean, these are the people who are trying to normalize it by calling themselves MAPs. Then again, they do like to attack their own when they don't have another target.
Rain :) 28 Sep @ 9:17pm 
Originally posted by Wild Child:
What do you expect? It includes probably all of Hollywood and most politicians. It's very likely the kind of thing people would overthrow the royalty for if they knew and weren't already victims of MK Ultra.

I expected someone to have the cojones to whistleblow something; leak something. It's very sad to see how far corruption has taken root
Originally posted by Ulfrinn:
So, they released the documents and you're still not happy? Well, why not?
Well, they canned Kimmel. But you're probably not happy about that either. Same thing.
Rain :) 28 Sep @ 9:22pm 
Originally posted by Wild Child:
Originally posted by Ulfrinn:

You don't want to see pedophiles convicted, you want to see Trump labeled as one. Which is why you people ignore all evidence to the contrary in a desperate hope the Epstein files will have what you so desperately want. And when they don't, suddenly they're not the REAL documents.
See that's what I don't understand. Wouldn't they like Trump if he was labeled as a pedo? I mean, these are the people who are trying to normalize it by calling themselves MAPs. Then again, they do like to attack their own when they don't have another target.

Trying to politicise pedophilia is stupid

and tbh, what would you have those people do? If you'd want people who fantasise about murder, but haven't yet indulged in murder, to seek help based on the fact that they're having those fantasies, why shouldn't the same logic apply to other criminal fantasies? I think you should only punish people for the crimes they commit, and not their urges. If you start punishing people for thought-crime, all it does is incentivise people with similar fantasies to remain hidden for fear of punishment rather than seeking help. Someone who seeks help is far less likely to commit the offence when undergoing proper treatment

I think it's also stupid to say that anyone is trying to normalise pedophilia. I think people are trying to give people with urges access to care rather than wait for a crime to be committed just to punish them
< >
Showing 1-15 of 22 comments
Per page: 1530 50

All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details