What kind of game are they objecting to?

You know, just because it's a game does not give it Carte Blanche.

MAN, I thought after I signed the amazing petition "STOP KILLING GAMES" BY ROSS THE BOSS that would stop! How did that happen?!?! Don't they understand what STOP KILLING GAMES mean? It was invented by ROSS! THE ROSS GUY! He promised the games won't die because that's a no brainer, how would anyone kill games if it says STOP KILLING GAMES?!?

Originally posted by :-::

MAN, I thought after I signed the amazing petition "STOP KILLING GAMES" BY ROSS THE BOSS that would stop! How did that happen?!?! Don't they understand what STOP KILLING GAMES mean? It was invented by ROSS! THE ROSS GUY! He promised the games won't die because that's a no brainer, how would anyone kill games if it says STOP KILLING GAMES?!?

I think 90% of the signatures were verified and the issue will go forward and be examined by lawmakers.

Originally posted by President Whatever:

What kind of game are they objecting to?

You know, just because it's a game does not give it Carte Blanche.

What they won't tell you is that a lot of the games are rape, incest, and pedophilia focused; sometimes all 3, and unfortunately mostly originating in Japan

It's a lot of overweight, creepy weaboo incels who are mad about this

Nah, I'm not asking anything to these companies.

They declared war, the same way leftists did back then. So my decision is already taken, no petition, just eradication. We have to make Bitcoin an alternative way to pay online, because only competition can humble them. I don't want to be stuck in a serie of battles "gamergate 1, 2, 3 ... I'm tired of this ♥♥♥♥, I go directly for the killing blow.

So yep, Bitcoin is the solution, not a petition. I want to be able to pay for my games in Bitcoins.

Originally posted by Rain :):

Originally posted by President Whatever:

What kind of game are they objecting to?

You know, just because it's a game does not give it Carte Blanche.

What they won't tell you is that a lot of the games are rape, incest, and pedophilia focused; sometimes all 3, and unfortunately mostly originating in Japan

It's a lot of overweight, creepy weaboo incels who are mad about this

This is correct.

Originally posted by robilar5500:

This is correct.

Not really. I've seen enough politicians / activists pretending to do it "for the childrens" to know that's pure BS. They never cared, otherwise why cover the pakistanese gangs in the UK and stuff like that ?

It's all about censorship from the very beginning and they thinked peoples will shy away and let them do it if the target was porn. Too bad, it will be more complicated than that it seem.

Originally posted by Netaris:

Originally posted by robilar5500:

This is correct.

Not really. I've seen enough politicians / activists pretending to do it "for the childrens" to know that's pure BS. They never cared, otherwise why cover the pakistanese gangs in the UK and stuff like that ?

It's all about censorship from the very beginning and they thinked peoples will shy away and let them do it if the target was porn. Too bad, it will be more complicated than that it seem.

Then why'd you feel the need to cut my post from the reply?

Originally posted by Rain :):

Then why'd you feel the need to cut my post from the reply?

I always do that ... I find it easier to read when there isn't 2-3 bubbles to read throught. I also doubt there is any truth in these statements to begin with. There is always exceptions of course, but knowing how hated pedos are, I highly doubt a majority of those games are like that. Sounds like the usual excuse : "Believe me, those guys are horrible, that's why we do that.".

I don't buy it, it's censorship as usual and porn or not, the content isn't the problem. The problem is : payment providers are just a service. They have no right to tell me what to buy or not, as long as it's not illegal. And considering how they were supportive with some websites like OnlyFan, it sound just like some pretexts to me. Yeah, I don't buy it, it's just the usual "another exec think I'm stupid enough not to see it coming".

Originally posted by Netaris:

Originally posted by Rain :):

Then why'd you feel the need to cut my post from the reply?

I always do that ... I find it easier to read when there isn't 2-3 bubbles to read throught. I also doubt there is any truth in these statements to begin with. There is always exceptions of course, but knowing how hated pedos are, I highly doubt a majority of those games are like that. Sounds like the usual excuse : "Believe me, those guys are horrible, that's why we do that.".

I don't buy it, it's censorship as usual and porn or not, the content isn't the problem. The problem is : payment providers are just a service. They have no right to tell me what to buy or not, as long as it's not illegal. And considering how they were supportive with some websites like OnlyFan, it sound just like some pretexts to me. Yeah, I don't buy it, it's just the usual "another exec think I'm stupid enough not to see it coming".

Does rape, incest, and pedophilia align with OnlyFan's TOS? I'd imagine not

I do agree it's overreach

However, I believe they can also choose who they do and do not do business with

I also believe that rape, incest, and pedophilic content is bad, shouldn't be legal, and shouldn't be widely accessible

The people who feel the need to consume that kind of content should do some much needed introspection

Originally posted by Rain :):

Does rape, incest, and pedophilia align with OnlyFan's TOS? I'd imagine not

I do agree it's overreach

However, I believe they can also choose who they do and do not do business with

I also believe that rape, incest, and pedophilic content is bad, shouldn't be legal, and shouldn't be widely accessible

The people who feel the need to consume that kind of content should do some much needed introspection

Payment providers are already bound to cooperate with police and justice when needed and governements already have the means to block a specific website if needed. What's unacceptable is them acting like some sort of "moral police" on their own. They're just a provider of services, nothing more, they have no right to decide what peoples can buy or not, period.

Because it's always like that, it start with something understandable and once it exist it's slowly expanded, until they'll litterally decide what you can buy or not for you. Better to stop such ideas in the egg and put them back in their places right now imo.

Sharing pedo content is already illegal and police + justice already watch for it. But private companies have no right to decide what you can buy or not, period.