All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details
U.S. preparing options for military strikes on drug targets inside Venezuela, sources say
U.S. preparing options for military strikes on drug targets inside Venezuela, sources say
< >
Showing 1-15 of 145 comments
agu 27 Sep @ 7:22am 
Do Colombia and Mexico next, until there's nothing left.
Do these sources have the next winning lottery numbers?
Are these sources inside Venezuela?

I'm fine with US using force to sink incoming cartel boats, but I guess VZ isn't getting the message.
YourDoom 27 Sep @ 7:37am 
Another lost wer for the usa. Place your bets.
Originally posted by YourDoom:
Another lost wer for the usa. Place your bets.

A big part of the reason we "lose" wars is because up until now, we've operated (mostly) under international law and according to ROE that keep us from using our full capabilities.

That is, for the most part, a good thing.

But I would not count on that state of affairs continuing under Papaya Pol Pot and Kegseth--and the Big Green Killpower with its gloves off has truly terrifying implications
Originally posted by YourDoom:
Another lost wer for the usa. Place your bets.

You lost 2 world wars frenchie
YourDoom 27 Sep @ 8:05am 
Originally posted by An Irate Walrus:
Originally posted by YourDoom:
Another lost wer for the usa. Place your bets.

A big part of the reason we "lose" wars is because up until now, we've operated (mostly) under international law and according to ROE that keep us from using our full capabilities.

That is, for the most part, a good thing.

But I would not count on that state of affairs continuing under Papaya Pol Pot and Kegseth--and the Big Green Killpower with its gloves off has truly terrifying implications
How comes the Soviet Union won the wars? They didn't use nukes.

And in Vietnam you sent 500k soldiers, while dropping napalm, so what are you talking about.
Last edited by YourDoom; 27 Sep @ 8:06am
Originally posted by YourDoom:
Originally posted by An Irate Walrus:

A big part of the reason we "lose" wars is because up until now, we've operated (mostly) under international law and according to ROE that keep us from using our full capabilities.

That is, for the most part, a good thing.

But I would not count on that state of affairs continuing under Papaya Pol Pot and Kegseth--and the Big Green Killpower with its gloves off has truly terrifying implications
How comes the Soviet Union won the wars? They didn't use nukes.

And in Vietnam you sent 500k soldiers, while dropping napalm, so what are you talking about.

I'm not talking about nukes.

Look at Iraq. Literally had an ROE that said if an insurgent ran into a mosque, that was "base," and attacking that area was off-limits.

Doesn't take a nuke to deal with a mosque; a mobile MLRS will make that mosque and the associated grid square *go away*, but we weren't permitted.

And as for the Russians, they fought with gloves all the way off in Afghanistan and still got pushed out--and how's Ukraine working out right now, comrade?
YourDoom 27 Sep @ 8:22am 
Originally posted by An Irate Walrus:
Originally posted by YourDoom:
How comes the Soviet Union won the wars? They didn't use nukes.

And in Vietnam you sent 500k soldiers, while dropping napalm, so what are you talking about.

I'm not talking about nukes.

Look at Iraq. Literally had an ROE that said if an insurgent ran into a mosque, that was "base," and attacking that area was off-limits.

Doesn't take a nuke to deal with a mosque; a mobile MLRS will make that mosque and the associated grid square *go away*, but we weren't permitted.

And as for the Russians, they fought with gloves all the way off in Afghanistan and still got pushed out--and how's Ukraine working out right now, comrade?
They won in Mongolia, and in Iraq the USA had the whole Europe as allied.
Originally posted by YourDoom:
Originally posted by An Irate Walrus:

I'm not talking about nukes.

Look at Iraq. Literally had an ROE that said if an insurgent ran into a mosque, that was "base," and attacking that area was off-limits.

Doesn't take a nuke to deal with a mosque; a mobile MLRS will make that mosque and the associated grid square *go away*, but we weren't permitted.

And as for the Russians, they fought with gloves all the way off in Afghanistan and still got pushed out--and how's Ukraine working out right now, comrade?
They won in Mongolia, and in Iraq the USA had the whole Europe as allied.
Apparently being allies with all of the civilized world was deemed 'unilateral'.
Originally posted by 76561198255695445:
U.S. preparing options for military strikes on drug targets inside Venezuela, sources say


And the fact that Venezuela owns the 2nd largest oil reserves in the world has nothing to do with it !
Last edited by ⓢⓔⓇⓘⓊⓢ_ⓢⓘⓂ; 27 Sep @ 8:28am
Originally posted by ⓢⓔⓇⓘⓊⓢ_ⓢⓘⓂ:
Originally posted by 76561198255695445:
U.S. preparing options for military strikes on drug targets inside Venezuela, sources say


And the fact that Venezuela owns the 2nd largest oil reserves in the world has nothing to do with it !
Didn't the environmentalists declare oil to be evil? If they truly have no interest in oil then its not a factor.
joco 27 Sep @ 8:31am 
I love a good fireworks show!
YourDoom 27 Sep @ 8:34am 
Originally posted by DarkCrystalMethod:
Originally posted by ⓢⓔⓇⓘⓊⓢ_ⓢⓘⓂ:


And the fact that Venezuela owns the 2nd largest oil reserves in the world has nothing to do with it !
Didn't the environmentalists declare oil to be evil? If they truly have no interest in oil then its not a factor.
China long time ago did warn the USA from attacking, I think OP is late.
Originally posted by An Irate Walrus:
Originally posted by YourDoom:
How comes the Soviet Union won the wars? They didn't use nukes.

And in Vietnam you sent 500k soldiers, while dropping napalm, so what are you talking about.

I'm not talking about nukes.

Look at Iraq. Literally had an ROE that said if an insurgent ran into a mosque, that was "base," and attacking that area was off-limits.

Doesn't take a nuke to deal with a mosque; a mobile MLRS will make that mosque and the associated grid square *go away*, but we weren't permitted.

And as for the Russians, they fought with gloves all the way off in Afghanistan and still got pushed out--and how's Ukraine working out right now, comrade?

The gloves are on in Ukraine because the Russians keep what they take.
Originally posted by Dwerklesberry:
Originally posted by An Irate Walrus:

I'm not talking about nukes.

Look at Iraq. Literally had an ROE that said if an insurgent ran into a mosque, that was "base," and attacking that area was off-limits.

Doesn't take a nuke to deal with a mosque; a mobile MLRS will make that mosque and the associated grid square *go away*, but we weren't permitted.

And as for the Russians, they fought with gloves all the way off in Afghanistan and still got pushed out--and how's Ukraine working out right now, comrade?

The gloves are on in Ukraine because the Russians keep what they take.

K, comrade. K.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 145 comments
Per page: 1530 50

All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details