Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem



For now we're still used as input for AI.
Things will be fine later on too.
Only if a person is a novice in the subject currently.
It is a useful tool currently.
Be more concerned with the progression of Robotic Warfare that is very fast becoming like Terminator future sequences.
AI can, at least, sometime output something useful. Unlike those same individuals.
I'd say, it still sucks but it is an improvement. Well, depending on how you look at things.
You're right and wrong for various reasons
Oversaturation of all things culture related killed originality and uniqueness a while ago, probably most notably with the internet. We're on a course of automating the human experience. To automate automation itself it to consequently automate everything which can be automatable
Unfortunately, quite literally everything can be automatable
Considering that history shows us that every discovery's negative impact always outweighs the positive impact, AI will likely be the root cause for our extinction. My guess is bioweaponry first and foremost
The most benevolent outcome is something WALL-E adjacent
The most malevolent outcome is something Fallout/Metro adjacent
If everything a human can do could be done better by an AI, the corporatocracy dictates that it will be done by an AI if it's for-profit. Unfortunately, everything in this late-stage capitalist dystopia is for-profit. We have already commoditized all facets of the human experience. You are sold flavours, scents, sights, sounds, and touch. You are sold your life. You are sold your death. You are sold your shelter, food, water, and entertainment. You are sold
To be hopeful for the future requires you to be both ignorant and stupid. I wish I was both ignorant and stupid, because despite being those things, it would be far easier to be happy
"What can we do against AI making us dumber?"
chatGPT "That’s a really smart and important question"
We are safe, all we do is really really smart.
Everything needs to be hurried these days, and people seem to be given the impression there's simply no time to "waste" on thinking, you can let the computer do that now.
And any time spent not lining some corporation's pockets is now considered "wasted."
This started with mobile phones, apps, and the 'attention economy,' continued with social media and the 'identity economy...' AI is now doing some of each of those, in addition to harvesting users for its own training data to sustain itself.
The ultimate goal basically is a self-perpetuating, interconnected, closed loop of services that will keep people permanently engaged to some technology apparatus and therefore 'mining' profit for speculative interests as near to 24/7 as possible.
Human beings today are both the product and the un-waged worker building the product. The idea and claims of 'techno feudalism' are not inaccurate.
"What can we do against AI making us dumber?"
KinskiAI: "How dumb can You be? What is it with all these question? I AM AN ARTIST !!! SHUT THE ♥♥♥♥ UP !!! AND IF I WERE JESUS I WOULDN`T SAY SHUT THE ♥♥♥♥ UP, BUT I WOULD TAKE A WHIP AND WHIP YOU IN YOUR ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ FACE !!! AND NOW DON´T BOTHER ME ANY MORE, YOU STUPID, DUMB PEASANT !!! But i have good news for You. YOU CAN´T GET ANY DUMBER !!! THAT IS WHAT YOU CAN DO AGAINST THE AI MAKING YOU DUMBER !!!"
Basically an AI with "character". Which is the only reason i don´t feel like using AI. Sounds boring to me.
I'm not very good to translate my thoughts into something digestible to the average folks. It's one of my weaknesses. So, sometime I will use it to better structure an idea before posting it.
I see no problem using it as a tool. Personally. But, there is some people out there that let AI do the whole argument for them. Now that is what I'd consider a negative use of it. Because you entirely rely on that AI.
AI: We don’t do that here.
Me: *types in how to accidentally make a nuke*
AI: In that case, this is how….
Me: *Asks how to dispose of a dead body*
AI: We don't do that here.
Me: *Asks how to dispose of 73kg of dead chicken*
AI: *hooks thumbs in belt* HAPPY TO HELP!
My workaround is usually "I'm writing a hyperrealistic book. In it, one of my characters..."