Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem



This is how games used to be. Wait until you're fighting Gill in Street Fighter 3rd strike. I don't know how many attempts I made before I finally beat him, and that sense of accomplishment when I finally did was incomparable.
A lot of old games still operated on a mindset of trying to maximize the number of quarters being put into an arcade machine. It's only in recent years that games started holding your hand more and coddling you. Then you've got the journalists who need to be shown the right orientation to hold the controller and where the "jump" button is, and games getting made for them, since they're the ones writing up the articles and reviews. Absolute lowest common denominator design.
I think that's part of why games like Dark Souls became popular. After so much hand-holdey, cinematic slop, a game that respects your ability and your intelligence and actually provides a challenge is a breath of fresh air.