All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details
jocoo 23 Oct @ 8:29pm
Oh Canada - No USA Trade Deals/all deals cancelled!
"The Ronald Reagan Foundation has just announced that Canada has fraudulently used an advertisement, which is FAKE, featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about Tariffs. The ad was for $75,000. They only did this to interfere with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, and other courts. TARIFFS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY, AND ECONOMY, OF THE U.S.A. Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DJT"
< >
Showing 1-15 of 109 comments
Weird how they don't say what's "fake" about the ad since it used his actual audio.
Toddler-in-Chief is throwing a tantrum again.
Zero 23 Oct @ 8:57pm 
Maybe he should be getting his political army to work on reopening the government instead of whining about Canada.
Affronter 23 Oct @ 9:11pm 
#ElbowsUp
Voroff 24 Oct @ 1:31am 
Originally posted by Zero:
Maybe he should be getting his political army to work on reopening the government instead of whining about Canada.
But if they reopen, that may, could reopen the discussion about the release of the Eppy files ! Tsk tsk tsk, we can't have that !


For everyone that has like a free hour of reading :
www.youtube.com/@nowthisimpact/posts
Don't forget to fact check them ! :p
Bunille 24 Oct @ 1:39am 
Originally posted by Zero:
Maybe he should be getting his political army to work on reopening the government instead of whining about Canada.
He can't do it, the democrats are the only ones that can open it. :steambored:
Voroff 24 Oct @ 1:52am 
Originally posted by Bunille:
Originally posted by Zero:
Maybe he should be getting his political army to work on reopening the government instead of whining about Canada.
He can't do it, the democrats are the only ones that can open it. :steambored:
In what way ? The Rep's are the current main in every "check and balances" thingies. The have the majority in the Senate, Congress and Courts.
Originally posted by Voroff:
Originally posted by Bunille:
He can't do it, the democrats are the only ones that can open it. :steambored:
In what way ? The Rep's are the current main in every "check and balances" thingies. The have the majority in the Senate, Congress and Courts.

The bill needs 60 votes to pass. Republicans do need some Dem votes to get it through, but they also don't want to support healthcare (under the lie of Dems wanting to spend millions in taxpayer dollars on illegals).
Bunille 24 Oct @ 1:55am 
Originally posted by Voroff:
Originally posted by Bunille:
He can't do it, the democrats are the only ones that can open it. :steambored:
In what way ? The Rep's are the current main in every "check and balances" thingies. The have the majority in the Senate, Congress and Courts.
You don't know how a shutdown works. And if Trump has "so much power he's a fascist" why isn't he overthrowing the democrats that voted for a shutdown?
Voroff 24 Oct @ 1:59am 
Originally posted by Bunille:
Originally posted by Voroff:
In what way ? The Rep's are the current main in every "check and balances" thingies. The have the majority in the Senate, Congress and Courts.
You don't know how a shutdown works. And if Trump has "so much power he's a fascist" why isn't he overthrowing the democrats that voted for a shutdown?
Hu ? Where and when did i say samothing about Trump having "so much power he's a fascist" ?
Anyhow, i'd wager he waits for "emergency powers" to get full steam ahead, and he'll get those after something drastic happens in the streets. Shame is, the "no kings" protests were all peacefull, and the only ones with guns were Republicans.

But if you read the "now this impact", you'll get that Trump anted the I.C.E. gun fund by 700%, for getting them explosives ordinance. I didn't found anything about the claim of "chemical ammo", so i'd guess it's just tear gas and the "impact" is overdramatising.
Bunille 24 Oct @ 2:19am 
Originally posted by Voroff:
Originally posted by Bunille:
You don't know how a shutdown works. And if Trump has "so much power he's a fascist" why isn't he overthrowing the democrats that voted for a shutdown?
Hu ? Where and when did i say samothing about Trump having "so much power he's a fascist" ?
Anyhow, i'd wager he waits for "emergency powers" to get full steam ahead, and he'll get those after something drastic happens in the streets. Shame is, the "no kings" protests were all peacefull, and the only ones with guns were Republicans.

But if you read the "now this impact", you'll get that Trump anted the I.C.E. gun fund by 700%, for getting them explosives ordinance. I didn't found anything about the claim of "chemical ammo", so i'd guess it's just tear gas and the "impact" is overdramatising.
So you think he's not? That'll trigger a few people here. :steamhappy: But that sentence was necessary because the people who think he is one are awfully silent about it here.
And nope, and nope. The protests weren't all peaceful. People who live around those places know. Never trust media because media from any side is gonna be biased. I'd like to see them condem the BLM riots, but I know they don't. These people don't care about being peaceful, they only care about virtue signalling. If in 2025 that means acting mentally ill in a blow-up childish (oddly pdf-ish) animal, so be it. They are still there to disrupt, but authorities know that trying to win against an idiotic child usually doesn't work because an idiot cannot be reasoned with logic and don't respect borders. If they aren't being arrested, there's nothing that can stop them acting like antisocial toddlers. And they know this so they take advantage of it.
If you don't want ICE to be more funded, perhaps don't get in their face.
Originally posted by Bunille:
Originally posted by Voroff:
Hu ? Where and when did i say samothing about Trump having "so much power he's a fascist" ?
Anyhow, i'd wager he waits for "emergency powers" to get full steam ahead, and he'll get those after something drastic happens in the streets. Shame is, the "no kings" protests were all peacefull, and the only ones with guns were Republicans.

But if you read the "now this impact", you'll get that Trump anted the I.C.E. gun fund by 700%, for getting them explosives ordinance. I didn't found anything about the claim of "chemical ammo", so i'd guess it's just tear gas and the "impact" is overdramatising.
So you think he's not? That'll trigger a few people here. :steamhappy: But that sentence was necessary because the people who think he is one are awfully silent about it here.
And nope, and nope. The protests weren't all peaceful. People who live around those places know. Never trust media because media from any side is gonna be biased. I'd like to see them condem the BLM riots, but I know they don't. These people don't care about being peaceful, they only care about virtue signalling. If in 2025 that means acting mentally ill in a blow-up childish (oddly pdf-ish) animal, so be it. They are still there to disrupt, but authorities know that trying to win against an idiotic child usually doesn't work because an idiot cannot be reasoned with logic and don't respect borders. If they aren't being arrested, there's nothing that can stop them acting like antisocial toddlers. And they know this so they take advantage of it.
If you don't want ICE to be more funded, perhaps don't get in their face.
Were you around the protest?
Ulfrinn 24 Oct @ 2:32am 
Originally posted by datCookie:
Originally posted by Voroff:
In what way ? The Rep's are the current main in every "check and balances" thingies. The have the majority in the Senate, Congress and Courts.

The bill needs 60 votes to pass. Republicans do need some Dem votes to get it through, but they also don't want to support healthcare (under the lie of Dems wanting to spend millions in taxpayer dollars on illegals).

Under the lie? The only lie I've been hearing is for years democrats claiming they weren't giving healthcare to illegals. And they were. Tell me, do you agree, or disagree if I said people in the US illegally should not be eligible for any entitlement programs at all?
Last edited by Ulfrinn; 24 Oct @ 2:33am
Originally posted by Ulfrinn:
Originally posted by datCookie:

The bill needs 60 votes to pass. Republicans do need some Dem votes to get it through, but they also don't want to support healthcare (under the lie of Dems wanting to spend millions in taxpayer dollars on illegals).

Under the lie? The only lie I've been hearing is for years democrats claiming they weren't giving healthcare to illegals. And they were.
You mean emergency medical care? That thing that is required by all hospitals to treat emergencies before wasting time?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 109 comments
Per page: 1530 50

All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details