Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So that's it! Absolute proof! Our sample size of two proves there is no difference!
what are u some kind of anti vaxors? go get ur booster shots
It helps if you put it in terms a 5 year old can understand just to make sure there's no misconception
Imagine a group of 100 people, the majority of which trade Pokemon cards. Because people who don't trade see people who do trade, some of them are likely to join the Pokemon card traders, maybe even getting you interested, despite not having an interest prior, but now having an interest because it's apparently popular
Now imagine a group of 100 people where a slim minority, lets say 5 out of the 100, or 1/20, want to trade Pokemon cards. They'll have a much harder time trying to convince people who aren't interested because of how niche it is
Same applies to virality*. You're not getting infected because the majority of people aren't sick/infected with it. If it were the opposite, where the majority was sick, you'd be far more susceptible
Rain explained community Immunity.
Did a great job too.