Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's my question.
ATGC is still ATGC
You're not introducing alien DNA or anything, you're just replacing the nucleotides. If AACA here causes cancer, and AAGA is the good variant, how does it hurt to switch it?
I don't foresee these things being done on the corner desk.
Is how baby formed?
If you could genetically edit your unborn child to have less risk of congenital diseases or cancer, why wouldn't you?
What's all the fuss about? Why wait till they are born and then treat the symptoms with prosthetics or drugs?
Last edited by Fajita Jim; 45 minutes ago
Is how baby formed?
If you could genetically edit your unborn child to have less risk of congenital diseases or cancer, why wouldn't you?
What's all the fuss about? Why wait till they are born and then treat the symptoms with prosthetics or drugs?
Last edited by Fajita Jim; 50 minutes ago
Others have mentioned the more principal issue though of how such procedures might to some degree create a scenario of class differences. Who would receive these treatments? Will it become mandatory for fetuses to be genetically modified; and if so, on what basis do we determine what is required and what is not, and who is making these decisions? What about those who aren't modified?