Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE0tQ6fYkOw
And here is the XG27ACS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXgvP84g2BU
cant trust influencer these days, but thx anyway
real experience always more worth something, something these guys wont tell you
They are using CalMan testing equipment which is better than any user experience coloured by their own purchase bias, no user can give you pixel response times, cumulative deviation results or colour calibration quality unless they have gone out and spent £2/3K on equipment.
Take the tin foil hat off for a sec, he does good reviews on monitors.
But it's a ROG, same reasons my 2 monitors are high end ROG monitors, seems the mid tier ROG:s have the same quality passed on.
pc gaming = 6.6
https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/asus/rog-strix-xg27acs
pc gaming = 7.3
Wrong monitor, MQ27A is the one he linked, uses a different panel to that and is a tad better but still not as good as the ROG one.
this make ROG is the winner,
thanks all