Gigabyte M27QA ICE OR XG27ACS
i just need little push, which between this is the best
and does FRC really matters or it just Gimmick
< >
Showing 1-7 of 7 comments
The author of this thread has indicated that this post answers the original topic.
Well here is how the M27QA performs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE0tQ6fYkOw

And here is the XG27ACS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXgvP84g2BU
Last edited by wing0zero; 13 Sep @ 4:38am
kinda hope there is a user of that monitor, so i can get real review
cant trust influencer these days, but thx anyway
real experience always more worth something, something these guys wont tell you
Last edited by ˢᵈˣ FatCat; 13 Sep @ 4:40am
Originally posted by ˢᵈˣ FatCat:
kinda hope there is a user of that monitor, so i can get real review
cant trust influencer these days, but thx anyway
real experience always more worth something, something these guys wont tell you

They are using CalMan testing equipment which is better than any user experience coloured by their own purchase bias, no user can give you pixel response times, cumulative deviation results or colour calibration quality unless they have gone out and spent £2/3K on equipment.

Take the tin foil hat off for a sec, he does good reviews on monitors.
I just watched them myself, I would go for the XG27 all day, much better monitor just for the well tuned dynamic overshoot setting, and it seems better in every other field.
But it's a ROG, same reasons my 2 monitors are high end ROG monitors, seems the mid tier ROG:s have the same quality passed on.
Originally posted by _I_:
https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/gigabyte/m27q-rev-2-0
pc gaming = 6.6

Wrong monitor, MQ27A is the one he linked, uses a different panel to that and is a tad better but still not as good as the ROG one.
so, after digging up more on my Local Forum , many Gigabyte user somehow have bad aftersales, and i dont know if this was a survivor bias but many Gigabyte user have LCD issue within less than 2 years
this make ROG is the winner,

thanks all
Last edited by ˢᵈˣ FatCat; 13 Sep @ 10:37pm
< >
Showing 1-7 of 7 comments
Per page: 1530 50