Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
How does the system know it is a scammer? It doesn't as the account is seen as a legitimate account until reported and locked. Accounts used to scam are already compromised accounts which the account creator either did not recover or are not aware it is compromised.
How does the system prevent you from being scammed when you fell for the scam? It cannot as you did the actions allowing it to be compromised.
And there is an invite limit as well that can last up to 30 days.
But if you insist, then fine, drop the auto report after multiple blocked requests. Even so, an option to auto block requests from profiles you haven't played any recent games with would still be a very nice QOL and security addition.
An account cannot be marked as being compromised by a scammer unless reported as being used to scam. Upon investigation Steam Support with proof of it being used to scam locks the account as the account creator is not the scammer, therefore they do not mark the account as being a scammer.
What you want to do is mark an account as being a scammer based on you getting friend requests which can falsely accuse the account creator of being a scammer by marking their profile.
You need to look at which groups you belong to as that is probably the source for these friend requests.
Have you checked the groups you are in because people getting random friend requests have being in giveaway groups for example.
I used to play F2P games on Steam, Path of Exile, The Secret World Legends to name two before switching to the external clients. Does that make me a scammer because i send you a friend request?
People do not just send requests based solely on games played. They may have seen a post or posts you have written and have similar viewpoints for example.
As for Steam level it has zero relevance. Why? Because both you and i show as level 0 therefore we are auto assigned the label of scammer and people often do that, while those with higher level public profiles are deemed trustworthy.
You created this thread with the premise of level 10, F2P games only, friend requests and deem anyone in those categories as scammers because you fell for a scam, yet higher level compromised accounts that were used to scam have other games not F2P.
How do i and others know? Because people posts the links to them after being scammed and want people to report the profile, which is naming and shaming the account creator who is not the scammer, as scammers use compromised accounts, not their own which can be traced.
And a lot of new people simply want to fill their empty friendlist fast, so anything goes.
And nowadays the largest volume of scams come from two sources:
-Hijacked accounts already in your friendlist
-Outside of Steam (Discord)
That's another subject. There's people here not looking after 'making friends' or who just mant their IRL friends in their list. A way to filter or block friend request would be welcome by some. But here we're clashing with Steam being not only a gaming social space but a game store and broadcasting what you're doing, playing and buying to as many people as possible is a marketing channel for the store.
Steam may be a “social” platform, but that doesn’t mean I should have to engage. Maybe the only people I want seeing what I’m doing are my friends. (Yes, I know that’s already an option) I still don’t want to see friend requests from profiles that I clearly have never interacted with. But fine, let’s say you switch the option from on by default, so now it’s something you need to turn on manually. I still think it would be a nice QOL feature.