Originally posted by Division By Zero:

Imagine listing a game for sale and not accepting reports of quality issues.

that is up to the game developers. some have their own website they use for bug reports

Originally posted by Division By Zero:

Imagine listing a game for sale and not accepting reports of quality issues.

https://gtm.steamproxy.vip/app/219990/discussions/0/769679119154676161/#c769679119154676836
You were provided a way to do what you are wanting.

OP also has a "bug report" about a boss being too hard, so I'm just going to assume his suggestions are being made in bad faith.

Originally posted by FFL2and3rocks:

OP also has a "bug report" about a boss being too hard, so I'm just going to assume his suggestions are being made in bad faith.

Not "too hard"... bad design.

Imagine a game that just one-shots you without warning and no clue what happened when nothing is wrong with your build.

Originally posted by Division By Zero:

Originally posted by FFL2and3rocks:

OP also has a "bug report" about a boss being too hard, so I'm just going to assume his suggestions are being made in bad faith.

Not "too hard"... bad design.

Imagine a game that just one-shots you without warning and no clue what happened when nothing is wrong with your build.

Dunno man, sounds like case of skill issue to me.

We have a dedicated forum for feedback. Next to nobody uses it. Most people post in whatever the first subforum category is, and most threads are offering feedback or looking for a group to play with.

The game has a forum. You even got a developer response to the issue you posted. It sounds to me like you posted it in the right place already.

Originally posted by Division By Zero:

Originally posted by FFL2and3rocks:

OP also has a "bug report" about a boss being too hard, so I'm just going to assume his suggestions are being made in bad faith.

Not "too hard"... bad design.

Imagine a game that just one-shots you without warning and no clue what happened when nothing is wrong with your build.

Dev replied saying it's not a bug, just your personal opinion it looks like.

Encountering a difficult area of a game is not a bug. You either haven't reached a significant level or are missing some aspect to allow you to advance further.

Originally posted by Division By Zero:

Originally posted by FFL2and3rocks:

OP also has a "bug report" about a boss being too hard, so I'm just going to assume his suggestions are being made in bad faith.

Not "too hard"... bad design.

Imagine a game that just one-shots you without warning and no clue what happened when nothing is wrong with your build.

Then put that in your review of the game. People complain about bosses in black myth wukong and i'm on my 3rd new game plus playthrough currently, definitely a skill difference between me and the ones complaining.

OP, having such a subforum required still does not mean game devs will use it.

Originally posted by The Living Tribunal:

Originally posted by Division By Zero:

Not "too hard"... bad design.

Imagine a game that just one-shots you without warning and no clue what happened when nothing is wrong with your build.

Then put that in your review of the game. People complain about bosses in black myth wukong and i'm on my 3rd new game plus playthrough currently, definitely a skill difference between me and the ones complaining.

From what I can glean, OP did a side challenge that has added difficulty and got punished for having improper armor or resistance values for the challenge.

Reminds me when I'd roll up in Diablo 2 with maxed out poison resist from chapter 1 to chapter 2's boss Duriel, and get frozen stun locked by his ice aoe.

Originally posted by Crazy Tiger:

OP, having such a subforum required still does not mean game devs will use it.

There are ways to detect and prevent this - check to see if the developer is reading them on time (or reading them at all).

If quality issues are not being attended to in a timely manner, add a decal on the store page noting that. This helps buyers make informed decisions and encourages high-quality games to rise to the top.

Reviews already serve that purpose.

Originally posted by Division By Zero:

Originally posted by Crazy Tiger:

OP, having such a subforum required still does not mean game devs will use it.

There are ways to detect and prevent this - check to see if the developer is reading them on time (or reading them at all).

If quality issues are not being attended to in a timely manner, add a decal on the store page noting that. This helps buyers make informed decisions and encourages high-quality games to rise to the top.

Steam is a store, not a publisher. What you want is a publishers job.

Plus that usage of game hubs is not mandatory.

Valve is very pro-developer. They give them freedom, choices and options.

Also, bug fixes don't indicate high quality games. A bad game with bugs fixed still remains a bad game. Just like bugs aren't always bugs, not having the right build for a boss isn't a bug (or bad design), for example.

Originally posted by Division By Zero:

Originally posted by Crazy Tiger:

OP, having such a subforum required still does not mean game devs will use it.

There are ways to detect and prevent this - check to see if the developer is reading them on time (or reading them at all).

If quality issues are not being attended to in a timely manner, add a decal on the store page noting that. This helps buyers make informed decisions and encourages high-quality games to rise to the top.

It won't. Especially when there personal opinions or preferences labeled as "bugs".