检测电脑硬件信息,并像库存筛选中有“是否适配steamdeck”的选项一样,让玩家可以在商店和库存中快速查找到自己的设备可以游玩的游戏
中文:我希望能出一个自动检测电脑硬件是否可玩某个游戏的功能,对于一些想使用集成显卡的笔记本去游玩一些小游戏的人会很有帮助,因为关于某款CPU及其集成显卡,在网上几乎没人测评它在玩各款游戏时的性能表现,如果你们出了这种自动检测电脑硬件是否可玩某款游戏的功能,不仅对于使用集成显卡笔记本的人很方便,也会对使用中端独立显卡并且想玩新出的大型游戏的玩家很方便。根据自身电脑硬件在库存或商店里筛选可游玩的游戏,就像库存筛选选项中有“完美适配steamdeck”一样。

English:I hope to have a feature that can automatically detect whether a computer's hardware can run a certain game. This would be very helpful for people who want to play some small games on laptops using integrated graphics because there are almost no online reviews of the performance of certain CPUs and their integrated graphics when running various games. If you introduce such a feature that automatically checks whether a computer can run a specific game, it would not only be convenient for people using laptops with integrated graphics but also for players with mid-range dedicated graphics cards who want to play newly released large-scale games. It would allow users to filter playable games in their library or store based on their own computer hardware, similar to how the library filter option includes "Perfectly Compatible with Steam Deck."
< >
Showing 1-1 of 1 comments
Ettanin 24 Oct @ 4:33am 
Liability. To the customer:
Steam would have to offer much more loosened refund options if they overestimated the capabilities of your system setup, be it drivers, interfering software or just misjudged hardware.

Liability. To the publisher:
Steam would be liable for missed sales if they underestimated the capabilities of your system setup, be it outdated hardware lists, misjudging benchmark results or due to interfering software.

The system requirement info fields are form free text fields instead of static fields in which to add or select hardware components from.
Valve would have to have a perfectly written and ranked database in which components are compared and benchmarked, something no vendor, not even specialized sites that benchmark hardware, can provide accurately due to exotic outliers.

No, Valve wouldn't do that.
< >
Showing 1-1 of 1 comments
Per page: 1530 50