Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
everyone above 1500 ELO knows 100% the Persians bonus smash the Romans bonus, it's a fact.
Persians have every bonus
As I said yesterday in your deleted post, Persians aren't even top 5 on Arena.
Savar is an Imperial Age unit
War Elephants are expensive, especially in 1v1
Xbows after Kamadaran cost 60 Wood + you need to invest 400 Food and 300 Gold in first place. Persians lack Bracer and Arbalest.
Right after the x2 HP Persian TC doesn't go down, the TC had like 20 percent HP and 2 petards barely even make a difference
Plus I idle the Persian main TC for 10 minutes
and they still afford Savar, 100+ Cheap Crossbow, Monks, 5 cannons & 3 Trebs, faster Imp, 4 castles, plus repair a castle from death twice with 2000 stone, repair a TC from death twice, Pikes, etc, + Gunpowder Castles bonus
All I have is Siege Onager with Teutons bonus and Skirms and Pikes and they afford all this
I had 2800 stone and can't even drop Castle too many cannons, BS
Playing Persians Arabia now, probably breach 1000 ELO with Persians, just like I did with Poles before dropping to 600 ELO (balance)
I guess you talk about this game? That's the one I downloaded
https://www.aoe2insights.com/match/361566123/#overview
Yep, mangos against that TC would've been a better call.
Overall, I think what lost you the game was:
- Overinvesting in Feudal Age when your opponent was already in Castle
- Making Spearmen despite no Cavalry being on the field for the most time
- Reacting slowly with countermeasures, you made trebs only very late instead of right in Imperial where you could've killed blue's castle. You can even tech into Bombard Cannons as those snipe Trebs
- Using infantry vs archers (and especially later against Hand Cannons, a unit that gets +10 attack vs infantry!)
- Not deleting villagers for some extra Army. With 147 vills around an hour you can spare some
Ironically Aztecs have a 58.62% win rate against the Spanish on 1v1 for the top 1% on non arabia maps, but at the same time it is worth mentioning that both the Aztecs (45.54%) and Spanish (44.88%) are currently ranked in the bottom 5 for win rates for top 1% with 1v1. While that does not take into an account all elo levels it does goes to show that Aztecs are not necessarily weak against the Spanish even if that is not historically accurate. Also, even at lower elo levels the Spanish have a weakness against Aztecs on arabia maps for 1200+ elo (56.68% win rate) and 850-1000 elo (62.22% win rate).
I remember it used to be the opposite where Aztecs and Spanish were among the top civs when it comes to win rates on 1v1 multiplayer, but not anymore. Aztecs not being a top civ anymore for top 1% happened a long time ago that probably took place before I first started playing this game from the month of June 2023. Spanish (44.88% win rate) and Turks (45.60% win rate) not being top civs anymore when it comes to 1v1 with top 1% is more recent where it is the opposite now with them both having low win rates for the top 1%.