Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem


And their Light Cavalry, which have no Hussar upgrade, no Bloodlines, no Husbandry, and no Plate Barding Armor?
... do you know how to play Vikings?
Throwing Axeman is underrated imo, but factually correct post.
The best light Infantry and Skirmishers in the Middle Ages were western europeans (Almogavares).
Halberdiers are synonimous with Europe too, specially Western Europe.
Pike Squares and the best Pikemen in the world were from Western Europe.
Genitours and Hobelars were also powerful Light Cavalry in Western Europe.
Also there is the gameplay element. No civ can compete without Trash units, so if you wanted to make all European civs have no good Trash units, you would have to give them a way to make Champions, Arbalests and Paladins without Gold, so you would be making their Trash Wars endgame EVEN STRONGER!
Historical accuracy isn't the point of AoE. Hence, why crossbows and trebuchets are ubiquitous, Ghengis Khan can fight Attilla the Hun, etc etc.
My point is there's absolutely no reason to nerf Franks light cav or Viking cav archers and other aforementioned units because they're obviously not over-performing or over centralizing, at all.
I guess he does not know History.
The only unit I could agree to remove from European civs, is teh Cavalry Archer, but then they would have to introduce a Cranequier unit. Maybe even a Mounted Pistollier unit.