HELLDIVERS™ 2

HELLDIVERS™ 2

View Stats:
Bartuc 12 Nov @ 5:17pm
WTF is going on with bugdivers?
Today is the prime example of why we have to go to ACAMAR IV and everyone is on TURING? Are they stupid or what?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 72 comments
kevin 12 Nov @ 5:20pm 
they are practicing liberty
Matheck 12 Nov @ 5:37pm 
Someone has to keep the bugs in check
Solitas 12 Nov @ 5:45pm 
Stupid? Debateable. Apathetic? Maybe. Ignorant? Absolutely.
The casual player doesn't understand the galactic map much beyond, go where numbers are high or planet is 'easy' (no negative modifiers) to play on (see Trandor).
It's a lack of information given in game. People see defense alert or high player numbers and they just go there. If High Command said, "All Helldivers on the bug front, Military Intelligence suggests quashing the infestation on Acarmar IV to stop the attack on other worlds" and 75% of the player base would go there.
Cheez3 12 Nov @ 6:13pm 
I hosted a couple missions at turing, and 2 randoms were roleplaying with "we have a mission gentlemen, killing bugs, no one left till the timer runs out" and we completed the mission mins ago.

kicked em right in the nuts
It might get better when we can vote on where the DSS goes. Hopefully players will congregate on those targets.
Dokutah 12 Nov @ 6:38pm 
"Don't make me tap the sign again."

*The Sign*

'This information is not given to a majority of the players in-game and is only shown on a 3rd party app.'

The fact you're having to be told this makes me question your intelligence.
ssj3nikoli 12 Nov @ 6:49pm 
why bother. where the bugs or bots go attack or defend is all developers decision and they change it as they see fit. they game is 100% pointless
spip1984 12 Nov @ 7:28pm 
1% of the helldivers know the gambits because they not explain them in game , for me it's an unfair mov from the dev , i tell them on the official discord and the french discord helldiver2 fr (french one suck and call me poor little crying girl and they kick me out when i fight back , mayby is the reson why only the modo are talking together lol )
Keystone 12 Nov @ 7:44pm 
Prime example of why the companion app info needs to be added to the game. A tutorial on how planet defense really needs to be added too because it's glaringly obvious people just don't understand it.
Bartuc 12 Nov @ 7:44pm 
Originally posted by Dokutah:
"Don't make me tap the sign again."

*The Sign*

'This information is not given to a majority of the players in-game and is only shown on a 3rd party app.'

The fact you're having to be told this makes me question your intelligence.
Wrong in game you can see the quantum lanes. So all the players know the origin of the attack.
Originally posted by Bartuc:
Originally posted by Dokutah:
"Don't make me tap the sign again."

*The Sign*

'This information is not given to a majority of the players in-game and is only shown on a 3rd party app.'

The fact you're having to be told this makes me question your intelligence.
Wrong in game you can see the quantum lanes. So all the players know the origin of the attack.

You obviously play this game too much and should go touch grass...
are we getting any new weapons, or strats, or armor or anything? no? then stuff it, i dont care
its honestly SUPER basic information that you can contextually understand even without an app or it being spelled out for you. please do not give people an excuse for being dumb.

they are simply completely unable to parse basic information thus they work neither smarter nor harder.

the notion of gambit, even if not knowing by name. just seeing the lanes 'WICH ARE VISIBLE IN GAME NOW' you can tell that all 5 attacked planets come from acamar. even the in universe context blurb gave that away. the fact a planet wich was unattackable for a whole month suddenly becomes attackable again should have been a basic context clue.

But no lets go attack the individual planets wich we know that even with hyper focus we can get 2 off at best
of course its impossible now. we'd have to lift the counter up to 11 percent per hour to make it
< >
Showing 1-15 of 72 comments
Per page: 1530 50