THOSE WEBSITE NAMES ARE VERY TRIGGERING, HOW DARE YOU. YOU HAD BEST CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE YOU OBVIOUSLY CISHET WHITE MALE!

#sotriggered #triggerwarning #thisisallstupid #whyamidoingthis

Offensive title lol its the Phobia name

Whats offensive is feminists and LBGT horrors that get on steam.. and whine about everything, no wonder people become gay, they have Gynophobia..

DanteYoda님이 먼저 게시:

Offensive title lol its the Phobia name :pandashocked:

Whats offensive is feminists and LBGT horrors that get on steam.. and whine about everything, no wonder people become gay, they have Gynophobia..

Wat.
Gay people don't have fear of women. That's far more offensive than anything else here.

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

DanteYoda님이 먼저 게시:

Offensive title lol its the Phobia name

Whats offensive is feminists and LBGT horrors that get on steam.. and whine about everything, no wonder people become gay, they have Gynophobia..

Wat.
Gay people don't have fear of women. That's far more offensive than anything else here.

I know right, read the Gynophobia phobia description, it says some who have this phobia can turn gay.

"Gynophobia was previously considered a driving force toward homosexuality."

I'm personally more philogyny with some misogyny thrown in.. kinda a love hate relationship with women...

DanteYoda님이 먼저 게시:

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

Wat.
Gay people don't have fear of women. That's far more offensive than anything else here.

I know right, read the Gynophobia phobia description, it says some who have this phobia can turn gay.

"Gynophobia was previously considered a driving force toward homosexuality."

I'm personally more misogyny with some philogyny thrown in..

Ah. Okay. I see what you meant.

I think the OP was trolling us.

Shouldnt we be talking about the connection between the title and the tag 'shooter'. Is this going to be a game about shooting woman?

^_^ you think Im joking but check the page. Its a shooter. Its a 'Violent, action, shooter'... based around killing woman... ohboysteam... and you thought the blowback on Hatred was hcore.

Tsubuyak¡님이 먼저 게시:

Shouldnt we be talking about the connection between the title and the tag 'shooter'. Is this going to be a game about shooting woman?

^_^ you think Im joking but check the page. Its a shooter. Its a 'Violent, action, shooter'... based around killing woman... ohboysteam... and you thought the blowback on Hatred was hcore.

Did you pay attention to anything about this game at all? Anything at all?
The man in it is suffering from a whole list of phobias, and to get over them, he's shooting at things that are not even real, but based on his phobias.

The difference between this and Hatred is these are not real people he's killing, last time I checked, there are no 30 foot tall giant women, nor the other bizarre things he faces in this game.

This is also a legitimate fear, so making light on this subject is a bit mean.
Comparing this to Hatred is like comparing this game to Candy Land. :)

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

Tsubuyak¡님이 먼저 게시:

Shouldnt we be talking about the connection between the title and the tag 'shooter'. Is this going to be a game about shooting woman?

^_^ you think Im joking but check the page. Its a shooter. Its a 'Violent, action, shooter'... based around killing woman... ohboysteam... and you thought the blowback on Hatred was hcore.

Did you pay attention to anything about this game at all? Anything at all?
The man in it is suffering from a whole list of phobias, and to get over them, he's shooting at things that are not even real, but based on his phobias.

The difference between this and Hatred is these are not real people he's killing, last time I checked, there are no 30 foot tall giant women, nor the other bizarre things he faces in this game.

This is also a legitimate fear, so making light on this subject is a bit mean.
Comparing this to Hatred is like comparing this game to Candy Land. :)

Wow dude... it was light banter for this relatively dumb topic. You A) need to chill and B) need to learn to cover you overreacting a little better.
I could personally care less either way. I do however want to see the fireworks if there are any to be had.

PS: Your analogy is ♥♥♥♥ btw.

Sorry for misunderstanding you.
I didn't mean to overreact.

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

Sorry for misunderstanding you.
I didn't mean to overreact.

No worries man. I appreciate the apology.

Even tough the op is just flamebaiting, and I salute him for the creating of an actual discussion to a bait-topic (wtf is wrong with people actually arguing about this joke topic?!)... I love triggering feminists. So good job, op.


You know 40% of women get beaten up by their man...
And this just points out one important thing: 40% of women should have better stayed in the kitchen.

Erretter님이 먼저 게시:

Even tough the op is just flamebaiting, and I salute him for the creating of an actual discussion to a bait-topic (wtf is wrong with people actually arguing about this joke topic?!)... I love triggering feminists. So good job, op.


You know 40% of women get beaten up by their man...
And this just points out one important thing: 40% of women should have better stayed in the kitchen.

You're silly. Also, I would have gone with the "What do you tell a woman with two black eyes? Nothing you haven't already told her twice."
That's a terrible joke. :)

Triggering Feminists is kind of like triggering Dolphins, it's not exactly the best idea.
I mean, you think Dolphins are nice and friendly, but they murder the hell out of sharks. :)

MundM님이 먼저 게시:

Tsubuyak¡님이 먼저 게시:

Wow dude... it was light banter for this relatively dumb topic. You A) need to chill and B) need to learn to cover you overreacting a little better.
I could personally care less either way. I do however want to see the fireworks if there are any to be had.

PS: Your analogy is ♥♥♥♥ btw.

How about make a statement and contribute to the discussion instead of insulting him for responding to your comment. I think it's good that people discuss this because it makes the game interesting.

First, I did make a statement. If you will kindly read what I said its about as relavent as the OP.
Second, your doing what your complaining to me about my doing. That is hypocrisy.
Third, the conversation between myself and David was resolved and complete. Your comment on the issue only stands to rekindle the 'problematic' section of the thread.
Fourth, third wheel much?

This thread is getting hilarious.