Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Which makes me think could they have a licensce with nintendo to put them on their online store? IS that one possibly reason why there getting delisted here? Because the license does not allow the games to be put on other stores? Nintendo has done stuff like this alot, and with many games too. I would not be suprised if they did something like this.
I initially thought this collection's delisting might have had something to do with the remakes or reboots or whatever they're doing with a bunch of their franchises, but it would make more sense to me to leave these up to generate interest in the newer versions.
I suppose it's also possible there were hidden costs linked to keeping these available that we don't know about and they were just delisted because they weren't selling enough to keep them up.
For now, all we can do is speculate.
As for the possible secret agreement with Nintendo - well, the only reasonable reason I can see is that Switch Online is a monthly paid subscription service which could potentially generate money for years for keeping the old games. Steam could sell the game once and ask for some service fees every year (not sure about this, but I heard that there are fees for keeping the game).
As for the SEGA, they might re-release their old titles collection for every generation of consoles and continue to receive money from Switch Online and other such services all at the same time.