Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
But it's still a video game for sale on a store, and the store saying "this game is in active development", which is a lie.
You don't have to get ripped off to expect stores to not mislead customers
Nowhere on the store page does it say that.
The early access blurb the dev wrote goes on to say "Suggestions on gameplay mechanics, game modes, and specific additions to the game will be ignored wholesale."
The "About this game" section below that reads "The game is currently in an extended and indefinite Early Access period so please do not purchase Sub Rosa without watching gameplay or doing a modest amount of research into the game."
The early access banner has a disclaimer for every early access game that it might or might not be in development because Steam is not the moral arbiter of making sure potentially burnt out indie devs update their games. If you had done any research you would have found out this information. That's not even considering the amount of effort that would go into defining criteria for what makes a game "Potentially Abandoned". Are old PC games from the 90s or early 2000s that don't get updates anymore "Potentially Abandoned"?
I'm glad you are aware that this game is truly dead, but if somebody ignores all the warning signs and plays a dead game for two hours and whines that they can't get a refund, who else is there to blame?
I think games that are abandoned should be VERY clearly labeled, if not removed from Early Access entirely. The Early Access system is for games in active development, it's counter-intuitive that it includes abandoned projects.
That's it, it's that simple. We can agree to disagree about it, we don't have to get into a whole debate.
Yes that is my goal. Do you care? Please care. What can I do to make you care? Please tell me, I have to have you care
lmao goodbye troll. stop engaging people for useless steam points
Don't act like you have anything better to do
PLEASE care, that was why I made this post :'( Why won't people care
And your response was "you're weird, you want people to care"?