Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The objective is to consign a well tested and playable game, in the present core features, completed and fully working.
The remaining part for us is to add content, and improve features based on feedback, but you should have fun without taking care of bugs and problems since the beginning.
Is there still room for additional backers? Also very curious if you guys have changed anything in development wise after seeing the failures of HW3 to fill the massive void after it's release?
From the looks of things, I don't think they needed to change anything in the game design. With that said though, that is a very good question. Did they glean any wisdom for HW3 failings and did that change any design plans? I'm guessing they were too busy to pay much mind while working on setting a new standard.
"we have to pay" ... who force u to buy a EA game? Maybe u can speak with the police, they may help u!
umm and yeah...that model really really worked out well for BG3, if only all games had that kind of development process, maybe we'd have less games coming out like a cornhole ejection.