Store Page
STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos News Guides Reviews

STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection

Store Page
View Stats:
Global Achievements
501st Clone Trooper 13 Jan @ 4:36pm
Awful port that should have never been made
Even without the bugs, glitches, and all the other things wrong with the game, it's still a bad port.

Graphics are bad and somehow look worse than the originals, all they did was take the original games and put shiny filters over the textures.

Takes up more space than both of the original games combined and costs more than buying both of the original games individually.

Missing cutscenes in the campaign.

The so called "Xbox DLC" is blatantly a stolen mod for Battlefront 2 that was a recreaton of it, even the creator of the mod pointed it out. Plus, it's not even accurate the true DLC and the Rhen Var map is clearly the Battlefront 1 version.

They couldn't even get the font right ffs, they got rid of the "Star Wars" looking font and replaced it with some generic font that looks like it was edited in Photoshop.

Pretty much the only good things I can say about this port is it has achievements, controller support, and split screen. How people defend this obvious cash grab is beyond me.
Last edited by 501st Clone Trooper; 27 Jan @ 5:04pm
< >
Showing 1-3 of 3 comments
Stark1999 13 Jan @ 4:42pm 
Why don't you go for other cash garb games like ubisoft made or ea made
#1
Kitai 27 Jan @ 4:51pm 
well considering this was an aspyr of course its going to be a bad port,
plus this is a remaster not a port,

if you want to see bad ports go play the original versions from 2004 and 05 youll see the difference in an awful remaster and awful port,

that said i had my fair share of issues but thats the charm of older games,
they never been perfect,
which ill never understand why this game was doa when it was alright and worked most of the time,
unlike the cash cows that are ea activision and ubisoft which their games still dont even work.

people should stop being bias and start playing actual good games like either this poor of an excuse remaster or the original ports.

imo original versions are better and should get more people because they are good games.
Last edited by Kitai; 27 Jan @ 4:53pm
#2
501st Clone Trooper 27 Jan @ 4:59pm 
Originally posted by Kitai:
well considering this was an aspyr of course its going to be a bad port,
plus this is a remaster not a port,

if you want to see bad ports go play the original versions from 2004 and 05 youll see the difference in an awful remaster and awful port,

that said i had my fair share of issues but thats the charm of older games,
they never been perfect,
which ill never understand why this game was doa when it was alright and worked most of the time,
unlike the cash cows that are ea activision and ubisoft which their games still dont even work.

people should stop being bias and start playing actual good games like either this poor of an excuse remaster or the original ports.

imo original versions are better and should get more people because they are good games.
Bro this is not even close to a "remaster". Literally all they did was take the original games and "upscale" the graphics using AI and called it a day. If we're talking about remasters, Halo CE and Halo 2 anniversary are remasters done right.
Last edited by 501st Clone Trooper; 27 Jan @ 4:59pm
#3
< >
Showing 1-3 of 3 comments
Per page: 1530 50

STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection > General Discussions > Topic Details
Date Posted: 13 Jan @ 4:36pm
Posts: 3

Discussions Rules and Guidelines