DA:V Massive SUCESS!?!?

Dude~~ r u ok?

Originally posted by Wiseman Bro:

DA:V Massive SUCESS!?!?

Dude~~ r u ok?

no! and uhh..... no!

i did not say it was a massive SUCCESS! mkay?

There's a broken sarcasm detector here and i find it ironic that the Wiseman is the oblivious party

Originally posted by Ancient:

There's a broken sarcasm detector here and i find it ironic that the Wiseman is the oblivious party

in my defense, i said it was a MASSIVE success, not a massive SUCCESS!

who would dare to ever say that about that game? i wouldn't and i didn't! now you can see my good ser, how this man is misconstruing my words in bad faith!

wise though he may be, he is malicious in his intent! i think we ought confront him about it? what say you?

After watching the Metatron trailer review on the Tube, I actually have hope.

It was the foolishness of Ubisoft which prompted me to make one more SONY console port purchase. Lucky me.

I'm super excited for the launch of Ghost of Yotei.

Don't see a problem with it, it's not out so cannot judge it. Not sure what it has to do with Dragon Age though. A different game, different genre.

"Suck cess"

Originally posted by Yew Nough:

"Suck cess"

cess as in "cesspool"? mmmmmmm...... kinky

No thanks , I am a male so I will not play with a female protagonist , woke detected

Originally posted by ★Don't call me sugar★:

No thanks , I am a male so I will not play with a female protagonist , woke detected

o. m. g.

mysoginy much?

If there's no agenda being pushed in my face that would break the immersion/ setting/ era, etc. of the game then I'll go to step two on my "Go/ No-go" list. If the play is solid and engaging as GoT was. Only then will I buy it.

I don't care if the protagonist is a frog, because I've played Frogger and during that time playing it on the Atari 2600 - when I was a child - even then I understood I was playing a game. Playing a female protagonist is a non-issue. It's a step up from playing a frog. Also, GoT had us playing a female as well for multiplayer, which was absolutely amazing, by the way and hopefully if GoY checks my first two markers, the multiplayer will be just as awesome or better.

As for the hate because, "female protagonist," WOW! Some people should look into deep sound bathing meditation and/ or perhaps breathing meditations more often... maybe get "lay-d" a LOT more, too. At the end of the day, it's a game. It's not reality. Anyone that allows a game to control and manipulate their emotions, is more feminine than the protagonist and that, my friends, is pure ironic comedy.

Originally posted by Dozer:

If there's no agenda being pushed in my face that would break the immersion/ setting/ era, etc. of the game then I'll go to step two on my "Go/ No-go" list. If the play is solid and engaging as GoT was. Only then will I buy it.

I don't care if the protagonist is a frog, because I've played Frogger and during that time playing it on the Atari 2600 - when I was a child - even then I understood I was playing a game. Playing a female protagonist is a non-issue. It's a step up from playing a frog. Also, GoT had us playing a female as well for multiplayer, which was absolutely amazing, by the way and hopefully if GoY checks my first two markers, the multiplayer will be just as awesome or better.

As for the hate because, "female protagonist," WOW! Some people should look into deep sound bathing meditation and/ or perhaps breathing meditations more often... maybe get "lay-d" a LOT more, too. At the end of the day, it's a game. It's not reality. Anyone that allows a game to control and manipulate their emotions, is more feminine than the protagonist and that, my friends, is pure ironic comedy.

uuuuuuh, you really went for the "lay more"? that's..... low.... even for me.....

also, more often than not, i found that the people who say that are precisely the ones thinking about it all the time cuz they don't do it that much to begin with.

all i'm sayin is.... it's a bad look bro.... a bad look

Originally posted by kcnue:

Originally posted by Dozer:

If there's no agenda being pushed in my face that would break the immersion/ setting/ era, etc. of the game then I'll go to step two on my "Go/ No-go" list. If the play is solid and engaging as GoT was. Only then will I buy it.

I don't care if the protagonist is a frog, because I've played Frogger and during that time playing it on the Atari 2600 - when I was a child - even then I understood I was playing a game. Playing a female protagonist is a non-issue. It's a step up from playing a frog. Also, GoT had us playing a female as well for multiplayer, which was absolutely amazing, by the way and hopefully if GoY checks my first two markers, the multiplayer will be just as awesome or better.

As for the hate because, "female protagonist," WOW! Some people should look into deep sound bathing meditation and/ or perhaps breathing meditations more often... maybe get "lay-d" a LOT more, too. At the end of the day, it's a game. It's not reality. Anyone that allows a game to control and manipulate their emotions, is more feminine than the protagonist and that, my friends, is pure ironic comedy.

uuuuuuh, you really went for the "lay more"? that's..... low.... even for me.....

also, more often than not, i found that the people who say that are precisely the ones thinking about it all the time cuz they don't do it that much to begin with.

all i'm sayin is.... it's a bad look bro.... a bad look

I'm sorry, I didn't know you were the internet king and that every word ever written, by anyone, everywhere, is supposed to cater to your specifications.

Lastly, igaf what it "looks like" and you have a grossly misinformed understanding as what people's habits are or are not. I hate to break it to you but, you wouldn't even make it as a fortune teller.

Originally posted by Dozer:

Originally posted by kcnue:

uuuuuuh, you really went for the "lay more"? that's..... low.... even for me.....

also, more often than not, i found that the people who say that are precisely the ones thinking about it all the time cuz they don't do it that much to begin with.

all i'm sayin is.... it's a bad look bro.... a bad look

I'm sorry, I didn't know you were the internet king and that every word ever written, by anyone, everywhere, is supposed to cater to your specifications.

Lastly, igaf what it "looks like" and you have a grossly misinformed understanding as what people's habits are or are not. I hate to break it to you but, you wouldn't even make it as a fortune teller.

you gotta let go of the anger brother, it's not worth it.... it's not worth it...