no. its really lacking in gameplay.. which is why the first game was so good.
to be honest most crapcom games arent "worth it".

LOL, Thanks for reply

For $2.50, hell yes it is worth it. The PC version doesn't have the same problem the console versions did - load times after dying are much more tolerable here.

for 2.50 its worth it

Yes, it is!

The gameplay is among the very best of this gen and perhaps all time. How the f*** anyone could call this "lacking" is beyond me.

The swinging mechanic is absoultely perfectly implemented. If the game had been successfull, it could have easily revolutionized the 3rd Person Shooting Genre with it, just like Gears did with it's cover system.

Looks interesting and I am going to check it out. I hope I'm not disappointed with it but, for the price, oh well.

Artures a écrit :

If the game had been successfull, it could have easily revolutionized the 3rd Person Shooting Genre with it, just like Gears did with it's cover system.

so if the game play is so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ amazing WHY wasnt it successful? yea, nice try. the swinging is the only thing they got right, so they got the gimmick right, just not the entire rest of the game.. they tried too hard to make it like another franchise. not like the old spiderman games didnt have great swinging mechanics or anything.

how often exactly does steam remove a game? i mean you have to be a pretty big pile of crap to actually be removed from steam.. because i have played alot of crappy games on here.

Not just wrong, but downright demented in your complete lack of any plausibility. That's how this mental clusterf*** of an argumentation in your second post makes you come off as. I won't bother you anymore.

i think the game was definitely fun. I played it on hard and fighting those big monsters can be quite a challenge and is tons of fun swinging around. IMO it's way better than all the other 3rd person shooters out there.

only probleme in this game - its hard to learn (like dark souls)
but after this game is very good - it have some awesome moments
and many good fighting gameplay
"must play" game

What's hard to learn for me is, swinging so far. Looks like it will be a good game though. Graphics are great in my book and the game play is easy enough, all but the swinging.

Six Tea Nein a écrit :

I know Rearmed is completely worth it but what about this one?

Don't even think about it - best game in the genre.

No its not worth it, the graphic is good but the gameplay sucks. The first 20 min its fun to swing but after that its just boring. I have play for 2 hours now and now i got the upgrade so i can throw things with the arm :/ ( that can you do at the first min in just cause 2).

And you cant swim so each time you hit the water you need to fast get up else you die. Plus almost all houses have radioactivity so you cant walk/climb them and the game point you where to go all the time.

Better you get "Just cause 2" its much more fun than this game.

If I recall game was bashed because people expect it to be a sandbox and hated the grappling mechanics requiring momentum and aiming (expecting the game to be automatic like in the Spiderman games).

I loved the grappling controls and the plot was pretty ok until the Super Joe being the super-evil villain wich totaly ruined the game for me (as I loved the original Commando and MERCS games), still it was actually a pretty damn fun game to play and visual eye candy.