Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
With that being said they do have a long history of not meeting deadline and are often a year or more late on their release date.
So the game is very likely real and most likely going to be released in 2026.
The only feature that we have shown that might not make it into the initial EA release would be the tank. Mostly because it is just really quite OP and we maybe will need some time to make sure the enemies have countermeasures for it. That said it may still make it in as a late game vehicle.
Or TinyBuild let it release as garbage and they lose the trust they've been building up in the gaming community for nearly 14 years at this point.
I think i am one of the few who do not mind a beta state game being unfinished and being worked on. Like 7 days to die 10 years as a alpha. I also know most people are not like me and if the game doesnt run perfectly they will be very unhappy. So i understand there is a difference between what i want and what is best for the company that is making this game. with that being said the game looks highly desirable.
Normally i would agree. Because it has happened so many times in the past few years. The only reason i do not think its going to be the case here is because they have made games with the same type of mechanics before. So this is mostly a combination of all the games they have made before with add options from other games they liked.
Now i know just remaking the same game can still be a problem. look at mount and blade 1 and mount and blade 2. just about the same game but took years to make. there will be problem and things that will need to be fixed/ changed but the core game is there.
With that being said I personally am a bit disappointed in the direction the game is going. I was hopeing for a down to earth game play like mount and blade or the movie timeline. Instead the game is going for the Power up and boss battles. I could be alone on this but its not what i was looking for. Dont get me wrong I am still going to get the game its just not going to be the perfect work of art that would be the only game i play for the next 10 years that i thought it was going to be.
And the last thing i wish to add about the game. The company that makes it has a history of delaying games until they are ready. So the fact they are going to release it in about a month means that they feel the game is in a ready state and are not being forced out the door like No Man's Sky was.
Could you tell me which games your talking about? As far as i am aware the only game made by Redemption Road is well... Road Redemption. And i have enough playtime in that game to know that that game is nowhere near similar to Kingmakers or issue free. Still worth it though. Only game i bothered to 100%
Of course a Tank would be OP. I mean, hello. How would there even be counter measures for it? Its medieval times with metal that would barely scratch the paint. Especially for the way a tank's steel is hardened. Nothing would be able to stop it.
Unless you make it like the original Civilization game. Where War Elephants could destroy a Tank, but that made no sense at all and took away the immersion of battles greatly.
Maybe the best option would be to leave it out all together if its that much of a concern? But than at that point, take away all vehicles. Because a helicopter is way OP as well. No way a dude on a horse with a sword or even a bow and arrow would be able to a thing about it.
There is no way even setting a tank on fire would stop it. They are built to with stand being on fire and even have fire suppression systems. There is also no way a knight could force their way in either. They would have no clue what they are even looking at or know whats inside to hit weak points. Nor would they have the tools to get in damage that type of armor.
But yea, If they are making a game like this. There is no way you are balancing anything fairly. So just let the players have fun. Or again, take away vehicles.
I mean, if you do bring this type of tech to the past. However they are managing the timeline and time travel. You would think by doing so it would change the future. So who knows what direction this will go in.
If the ballistas are a threat. Than they would be a priority target. So theres still no chance there.
Anyway, no point in debating something as wacky as this. They can do anything but if they are able to be destroyed. They better come up with a damn good way to do so. As you say, as long is its fun.
They added giants? I did not see this in any trailer? I also hope they do not start adding in mythical creatures. The game would be a hard pass for me than.