Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Are you blind or something? 30 fps is not "fine," it's jittery as hell.
I think it is okay in this case here.
Anyway, it's true that the way this game was programmed doesn't support above 31fps, if you manage to force it to run at a higher framerate, the game will be destroyed.
There is no single PS1 game that runs at 60fps. Funny enough I believe the first console to achieve 60 fps was Dreamcast.
Since Future was 60 fps (most of the time), this is a given that an HD version would be too.
that is simply NOT TRUE.
https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/2bb9rm/til_the_ps1_has_more_games_running_at_60fps_than/
the dreamcast was the first console to render in progressive scan though.
As for this game, 60's pretty much impossible. The game was programmed specifically for Dreamcast, and the game speed is directly tied to the framerate. It even runs at 60 in menus, and for half a second you can see the game suddenly run at 60 while fading into the options menu (and speed up simultaneously).
Silent Hill on PSone never ran at 60fps...
Try out running it at 30fps on an emulator, it's hell.