Portal with RTX

Portal with RTX

Visa statistik:
BlueDragonXD 30 dec, 2022 @ 18:05
It's not worth it upgrading from 1080P to 1440P on 27" Monitor.
27" Monitors are perfect size for sitting regularly at a computer desk. I have three 27" monitors. They are all 1080P. And what I'm about to say is based only on my single day experience using 1440P. Different monitors, or different people may change the overall outcome. But this is my experience.

People kind of snubbed me for having a 4080 and only using 1080P. lol I wanted to know what 1440P was like anyhow. I planned to upgrade to 1440P but comments made me believe I was missing out on something. So I upgraded a little sooner then originally planned.

I bought a $600+ 1440P monitor. While it's a good monitor. I barely noticed a quality boost in almost any game. 1080P looks basically the same. I know it's not a DLSS setting etc. I'm using DLSS quality and tried no DLSS super sampling at all.

If I view them both 1080P and 1440P side by side live. Maybe I would notice a little more but from my tests it's very minimal.

I've tested several games. Sure if I know were to look I notice a slight visual appearance boost. But otherwise it's pointless. It's barely worth it even if FPS stayed the same. But FPS went from 150 to 100 and since it's still playable I will try it out longer. I can easily switch back to 1080P and move this monitor over to my other monitors. Like swap them. So my 1080P is back in the middle for gaming. And my 1440P can be my side media monitor.

I just want to let people know. Sure the 1440P monitor may have other benefits too. Outside of gaming etc. But it has some downsides as well. I promise you if buy a better 1080P monitor it will do more for you at 27" than 1440P will. If you already have a top tier 1080P monitor. Upgrade to 1440P if you want a slight boost.

Even if you upgrade quality of monitor and go for 1440P. You won't likely notice any major difference. I still consider myself a 1080P gamer. I would rather have 150 FPS then the slight quality boost I got. Some people who use 1440P or 4K also lower graphic settings to pull it off.

Your probably downgrading your experience if you use 1440P or 4K and lower settings to compensate for FPS. Just use a 1080P monitor with maxed settings. I'm still using max settings on 1440P and barely notice a difference in visual quality.

Note: If you go above 27" likely 32" or higher. Sure I'm willing to say that 1440P or 4K may be more viable. Even at 32" 4K is likely still overkill. But that's not what this discussion is about. We were only talking about 27" are people really using 27" 4K monitors for gaming? That's actually sad. lol I don't exactly regret this. I had to see for myself. And like I said the monitor still has it's uses.
Senast ändrad av BlueDragonXD; 30 dec, 2022 @ 18:11
< >
Visar 1-15 av 53 kommentarer
Migz - DH 30 dec, 2022 @ 22:21 
I use two 3440x1440 monitors. A 34" and 35".
They're amazing.
Senast ändrad av Migz - DH; 30 dec, 2022 @ 22:21
illgib 1 jan, 2023 @ 18:37 
Ursprungligen skrivet av Akgis:
I use 27' 4K...
How to waste money, part 1.
4K under 30'/40' it's useless.
Migz - DH 1 jan, 2023 @ 18:41 
Ursprungligen skrivet av illgib:
Ursprungligen skrivet av Akgis:
I use 27' 4K...
How to waste money, part 1.
4K under 30'/40' it's useless.
:BL3Shrug: I have not used a 27" 4K monitor, so I cannot say how it is from experience.
However, I used to use a 27" 1080p monitor, and I regularly wished for a higher resolution at the same screen size.
HE1NZ 2 jan, 2023 @ 1:34 
1440p is a sweet spot right now, especially since you have a powerful GPU.

Also it's important to have 120hz+ and VRR (Gsync or Freesync).
Dr.Abscondus 2 jan, 2023 @ 13:08 
People still buy monitors? Weird.
illgib 2 jan, 2023 @ 14:42 
Ursprungligen skrivet av Migz - DH:
Ursprungligen skrivet av illgib:
How to waste money, part 1.
4K under 30'/40' it's useless.
:BL3Shrug: I have not used a 27" 4K monitor, so I cannot say how it is from experience.
However, I used to use a 27" 1080p monitor, and I regularly wished for a higher resolution at the same screen size.
In fact the range 20'/30' it's the sweet spot for 2k, under it's 1080p domain, 4k it's for bigger screen over 30'.
A 27' 4k it's a waste of money.
Cokefish 2 jan, 2023 @ 15:53 
If you choose 1440p, you need ultrawide (21:9). I have a curved 34" 1440p Ultrawide and I would never, not in a million years go back to a standard widescreen.
I agree that if you're sticking with standard widescreen then you should choose 1080p over 1440p.
Migz - DH 2 jan, 2023 @ 17:07 
Ursprungligen skrivet av Dr.Abscondus:
People still buy monitors? Weird.
As opposed to....?
Migz - DH 2 jan, 2023 @ 17:09 
Ursprungligen skrivet av illgib:
Ursprungligen skrivet av Migz - DH:
:BL3Shrug: I have not used a 27" 4K monitor, so I cannot say how it is from experience.
However, I used to use a 27" 1080p monitor, and I regularly wished for a higher resolution at the same screen size.
In fact the range 20'/30' it's the sweet spot for 2k, under it's 1080p domain, 4k it's for bigger screen over 30'.
A 27' 4k it's a waste of money.
To each their own. :-)
HE1NZ 2 jan, 2023 @ 20:21 
Ursprungligen skrivet av Cokefish (shrillby):
If you choose 1440p, you need ultrawide (21:9). I have a curved 34" 1440p Ultrawide and I would never, not in a million years go back to a standard widescreen.
I agree that if you're sticking with standard widescreen then you should choose 1080p over 1440p.
Lol. Another victim of marketing.
Migz - DH 2 jan, 2023 @ 20:32 
Ursprungligen skrivet av HE1NZ:
Ursprungligen skrivet av Cokefish (shrillby):
If you choose 1440p, you need ultrawide (21:9). I have a curved 34" 1440p Ultrawide and I would never, not in a million years go back to a standard widescreen.
I agree that if you're sticking with standard widescreen then you should choose 1080p over 1440p.
Lol. Another victim of marketing.
Eh?
Seamus 3 jan, 2023 @ 12:49 
Ursprungligen skrivet av BlueDragonXD:
27" Monitors are perfect size for sitting regularly at a computer desk. I have three 27" monitors. They are all 1080P. And what I'm about to say is based only on my single day experience using 1440P. Different monitors, or different people may change the overall outcome. But this is my experience.

People kind of snubbed me for having a 4080 and only using 1080P. lol I wanted to know what 1440P was like anyhow. I planned to upgrade to 1440P but comments made me believe I was missing out on something. So I upgraded a little sooner then originally planned.

I bought a $600+ 1440P monitor. While it's a good monitor. I barely noticed a quality boost in almost any game. 1080P looks basically the same. I know it's not a DLSS setting etc. I'm using DLSS quality and tried no DLSS super sampling at all.

If I view them both 1080P and 1440P side by side live. Maybe I would notice a little more but from my tests it's very minimal.

I've tested several games. Sure if I know were to look I notice a slight visual appearance boost. But otherwise it's pointless. It's barely worth it even if FPS stayed the same. But FPS went from 150 to 100 and since it's still playable I will try it out longer. I can easily switch back to 1080P and move this monitor over to my other monitors. Like swap them. So my 1080P is back in the middle for gaming. And my 1440P can be my side media monitor.

I just want to let people know. Sure the 1440P monitor may have other benefits too. Outside of gaming etc. But it has some downsides as well. I promise you if buy a better 1080P monitor it will do more for you at 27" than 1440P will. If you already have a top tier 1080P monitor. Upgrade to 1440P if you want a slight boost.

Even if you upgrade quality of monitor and go for 1440P. You won't likely notice any major difference. I still consider myself a 1080P gamer. I would rather have 150 FPS then the slight quality boost I got. Some people who use 1440P or 4K also lower graphic settings to pull it off.

Your probably downgrading your experience if you use 1440P or 4K and lower settings to compensate for FPS. Just use a 1080P monitor with maxed settings. I'm still using max settings on 1440P and barely notice a difference in visual quality.

Note: If you go above 27" likely 32" or higher. Sure I'm willing to say that 1440P or 4K may be more viable. Even at 32" 4K is likely still overkill. But that's not what this discussion is about. We were only talking about 27" are people really using 27" 4K monitors for gaming? That's actually sad. lol I don't exactly regret this. I had to see for myself. And like I said the monitor still has it's uses.
This is a really long way of saying you need glasses.
envirovore 3 jan, 2023 @ 12:58 
OP not only needs glasses but also has the bonus of not understanding pixels per inch/pixel density.
Senast ändrad av envirovore; 3 jan, 2023 @ 13:01
Seamus 3 jan, 2023 @ 13:36 
Ursprungligen skrivet av envirovore:
OP not only needs glasses but also has the bonus of not understanding pixels per inch/pixel density.
I think that lack of proper vision is directly contributing to not understanding pixel density.
envirovore 3 jan, 2023 @ 13:48 
Ursprungligen skrivet av Seamus:
Ursprungligen skrivet av envirovore:
OP not only needs glasses but also has the bonus of not understanding pixels per inch/pixel density.
I think that lack of proper vision is directly contributing to not understanding pixel density.

Quite possible.
But given their last note in their first post...seems they don't understand that a 1440P monitor at 32" is the same PPI as a 24" at 1080p and only slightly better than a 1080p @ 27", and that just because the screensize is bigger doesn't make a crisper image.
Or they don't understand that resolution is a fixed total number of pixels, regardless of how big the panel is (which I suppose is just another way to put PPI in perspective for those that don't know or understand that)
< >
Visar 1-15 av 53 kommentarer
Per sida: 1530 50