The one and only job of this franchise was to continue the story of Origins with updated graphics and QOL improvements, perhaps with added classes. The failure to do exactly that is baffling both creatively and commercially. Why they felt the need to abandon the story of Origins and go off on these tangents is just bizarre....

I'm a huge fan of the Dragon Age serie. I even liked the 2nd one. This one is heavy, the whole politically correct theme bother me. But, is that all? There's a skill tree, there's combos, there's combat mechanics. There is a lot to this game. I don't know....

After all the hate died down, I gave this another look and it might not be as bad as people said. I thought Inquisition was decent but got repetitive and bloated later on. Is Veilguard actually better?

Right now, The Veilguard sits at a strong 84 on review aggregate site Metacritic, which is about on par with previous entries in the Dragon Age series. The original Dragon Age: Origins scored an 86, while Inquisition landed close at 84. Meanwhile, Dragon Age II, perhaps the most divisive game in the series, holds a 79. Despite some mixed reviews here and there, The Veilguard is a massive success, both critically and commercially, with impressive sales numbers reflecting a strong reception from fans. Some r...

Mass effect: Andromeda was a flop. Dragon Age: The Veilguard was a flop. The two series are still good. Though as for where they should take Dragon Age in my opinion is restart the series to rebuild it sure they could just remake Origins and all its content same for Dragon Age 2. Though what about starting from scratch combining lessons they have learned and possibly some additional things. Example Mass Effect you imported your save data from the first to the second and then to the third game. Would be int...