Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If they do go for a different approach, it would probably have a different title.
1) They are a passion project of the devs.
2) They have the budget of your average office pizza party.
It's honestly kind of a miracle Fuga 1 came out let alone Fuga 2.
Trying to make an open world game would be way too expensive for them.
So no, they are going to save as much money as they can by reusing whatever they can while still trying to improve upon Fuga 2.
And honestly I'm glad, the games are both pretty unique and really good, so I hope they stick to this formula with a third game.
Although I suppose Solatorobo had some messed up stuff in it, too. Wish these were on Steam.
'Metal Max Xeno' and 'Xeno Reborn' are NOT good representatives of the Metal Max franchise; they were minimalist attempts to keep the series alive with jiggle-bait characters and are not truly open-world since you follow a linear counter-clockwise path across the map to a defined final boss with no real sidequests.
---
As for 'Fuga 3': If it happens, at most it will allow branching map destination selections. The team effectively made these out of their own pocket money while doing other things; very much the definition of a passion project.