安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Do you need to ask? Of course we do! ;)
From that perspective, being naked would give you a massive dodge bonus, a big cold resistance penalty, and probably a huge bonus to seduction attacks. Zero damage reduction, too. Why is it not an option? I have no idea. In a world where people have sex every time they go out to pick berries, it wouldn't be hard to say that someone being naked in a town definitely wouldn't raise any eyebrows. Even if it did, it could still be mechanically allowed (with appropriate events in cities if you run around naked) or could be an option outside of cities. Basically there are plenty of ways to make it an option, and even a mechanically viable one.
Not that the stats on armor makes any sense regardless. Wearing thick heavy combat hides gives you a penalty to cold resistance, but a fishnet bodysuit or super thin dancer's silks give no cold resistance penalty at all. Comfortable clothes and kimono give far less dodge bonus than lamellar armor or a heavy leather coat. A ridiculously heavy giant breastplate gives less damage reduction than a leather jerkin or mail bikini.
This is very much a "we do what we like, it's a crazy and very unrealistic game, things don't have to make sense" development team. If they decided that they don't want players to be able to be naked, that's just the way it's going to be, and there's not going to be any logical explanation for it.
Nelia can make a supersexy (but kinda distracting) Fishnet Outfit for some spider silk and 2k electrum. Closest thing to free roaming you can get to I think.