安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Oh and i actually just this week, gave AOE4 a chance, and big surprise. but when the game is updated by the devs it breaks every save game you had, so on single player camp if you do not complete a camp in one session then your save game is at the mercy of being broken in any updates before you get back to it........how this franchise is still around is beyond me.
Yes the game is harder because the AI is less incompetent and yes the AI is cheating as it is basically any strategy game.
I beat the campaign on the hardest difficulty and honestly, just change your approach and you'll be fine. This is a strategy game. Not some city-builder sim. So if whatever you're doing is not working you have to change what you're doing.
Omega Man is actually right.
You can notice, that definitve editions have very low % achievments for campaign completion
They replaced original AI with new AI in campaigns - new AI does not cheat, but it is super effective (on the land maps, on water is broken), and broke difficulties in campaigns with that.
These classic campaigns were balanced arround original AI, and with new effective AI, many missions became extremely hard - for example Genghis Khan 3 - Into China,, where player deals with 4 enemy AI