Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem









any fascist dictatorship get their ruler titled führer
likewise communist nations get their ruler titled chairman
presidential dictatorships and bourgeois dictatorships get their ruler titled president
and any monarchy get their ruler titled king
but germany will change their color to black when fascist
and russia will change their color to red if communist
and for germany specifically the title given to the ruler is führer
Or that Laissez-Faire, Interventionism, State Capitalism, have different roles and timeframes. EG State Capitalism early game to build factories, Interventionism for mid game to keep factories running, and Laissez-Faire late game so that capitalists go lazy. Laissez-Faire early game is terrible, since artisans are better than factories and capitalists don't have enough money to get factories up and running.