STEAM GROUP
Dragon Commander Multiplayer DragonMulti
STEAM GROUP
Dragon Commander Multiplayer DragonMulti
1
IN-GAME
16
ONLINE
Founded
14 April, 2014
Language
English
Location
United States 
Leniovias 11 Jun, 2014 @ 1:51pm
Private Tournament
Hi all, how about we try to create a tournament on our own (no price, JUST FOR FUN), exclusive for group members? Pls remember that this is a discussion thread where we want to collect some ideas, details can be discussed later, aswell as rules are open (e.g. if it's a campaign tournament or SKR only).
I wanna mention that we should be able to find atleast 8 Members for this to happen, aswell as we need to discuss the fixed time setups.

Key Points to be discussed before starting such a tournament, detailed rules such as map choice can follow before the tournament begins:
- 1v1 (min. 8) or 2v2 (min. 16?)
--> if 2v2, Skype/Teamspeak etc. allowed?
- campaign (with/without SKR), SKR or mixed?
- Group Stage + K.O. or K.O. only?
--> if campaing: 4 Player campaign instead of group?
- fixed time or flexible?
- fixed map or random (or maybe rotation)?
- ...

My general idea:
- 1v1 tournament with Group Stage (4 man groups, 2 pass through)
- SKR only, Bo3 in K.O., Bo5 in Grand Final
- fixed time limit (one week) for the fights, to be discussed later on
- Map rotation, but each week the map for all players has to be the same.



Sry if my english is horrible, i'm german ^^'
Greetings, SkyDrake
< >
Showing 1-6 of 6 comments
Frost 15 Jun, 2014 @ 9:22pm 
Hey man sorry for not getting this sooner but I really like this idea and will totally suport you in anything you need.

I like the idea of a 1v1 skirmish tournament, for the first one I think it would be realistic to try and get two brakets of 4 people

This is my bad drawing for the brakets lol
|--_
|-- --_
|--_-- -
|-- -
- ----
|--_ -
|--_--_-
|--_--
|--

Also I was thinking that we should only use the core set of maps, as the newer ones pulled from the single player campaign are unbalanced

For spectators each should have two were the spectators do nothing but watch and dont even sell there capital (this allows for capturing it and making it, as best we can at least like the spectator isnt even there)

And finially it might be a good idea to have a coin toss through an intermediary program were the winer can chose the map he or she wants to play on
Last edited by Frost; 15 Jun, 2014 @ 9:24pm
Leniovias 17 Jun, 2014 @ 3:24pm 
Originally posted by FrostyCyclops:
Hey man sorry for not getting this sooner but I really like this idea and will totally suport you in anything you need.

It's okay, happens ;D

It's nice to see that you like my idea ^^
However, i wonder what will happen to spectators once they are "defeated". Will they stay in game or disconnect automatically? I don't know that xD

Another problem might be time zones. Who knows where all the players live... it will get hard to match up myself (as example) with someone who lives in the USA. We can solve this, but this will effort much communication as soon as we got all members up.

I'll open up another thread where we can collect the ones who are interested in that tournament, and i'll create the bracket after we got enough members up (if we get enough).

Again sry for my english ^^'
SkyDrake
Frost 17 Jun, 2014 @ 5:17pm 
Your english is actually pretty good so no worrys

Time zones is definatlly an issue as most members in this group are from around the world, but its something we will have to work player by player

As for a "defeated" spectator they will stay in the game able to watch, Ive played in a few games were we had spectators, it was pretty interesting the two spectators fought eachother with there dragons untill the action started lol
JenꞳter 17 Jun, 2014 @ 7:30pm 
Eight players is a minimum? Some kind of joke or should be a real plan? Whatever, I don't think that you can get a result from for a half dead group. They're all sleep like a bears in their den when it's deep and cold whinter. If not eight, so four - it's a can be real productivly, do you think so? Collect 4 and don't delay with game - that's really enough as a fact, let me to state this.
Frost 17 Jun, 2014 @ 8:25pm 
Mr. Q-wer-T I consider myself a realist which by definition means having a firm grip on reality and the abilty to assess a situation clearly without falling victim to propaganda, misconceptions, or titles.

Currently we have 3 players and possibly 5 if you include SkyDrake and my self, now if you ask me we can get between 5 or at the very least 3 more players, yes I believe thats realistically possible

Now I dont appreciate you talking about our group in such a way, we all have lifes not to mention that steam doesnt exaclly make it easy to remember to check there game forums in the steam launcher. Added the facts that this game was marketed towards RPG players instead of RTS players coupled with the fact that its buggy in campaign modes makes this a difficult game to get into.

So I think its reasable that we can wait a few more days to collect some players, if not then Ill take it up under advicement then.

While we wait however if you want Id be more then willing to play some skirmishes with you, to help you practice, or just have some fun while were waiting.

Send me a message Im always willing to play
JenꞳter 17 Jun, 2014 @ 8:30pm 
Fine, I'll chill out. I'm realist too but when always only one result you receive - it's a much more pitty in anyway.
Well, I'm take under my wing your.. "Invite". Now I'll send you an adding and after we can to play, dear realist FrostyCyclops. Sendng in the progress.

Now I dont appreciate you talking about our group in such a way
Yes, like and me too. Paradoxically? Right, I can find that so. That's why me exist how a realist. Sorry, it's not politely say what's was in the my prefix, but it's truth, case no activity. Reason? To my opinion, that's unreachable for understanding. Not a pessimism, by the be.

But well, think straight
So I think its reasable that we can wait a few more days to collect some players
I'm not too against your thinks. I don't make haste and I've got a resonable patient for this. And, by the way, I trust you, your message persuasively.
Last edited by JenꞳter; 17 Jun, 2014 @ 8:42pm
< >
Showing 1-6 of 6 comments
Per page: 1530 50