Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I find the door myself..
I agree with both sentiments, if we get enough teams it will be good to have everyone come together with rules for the season.
The password situation unfortunately doesn't look like it will be fixed because as far as I know, no active person can consistently change the passwords for the servers.
Hopefully those who already know the passwords won't grief the matches and hopefully those who do use their better judgement and decide not to ruin others games until we find another solution.
I personally much prefer DL as I feel it's more systematic and tense however if the majority of teams would rather Dom we could look into that instead.
Maybe a way to meet in the middle would be that if 2 teams tie map counts at 3-3, 1 map of domination could be the decider for the winner if tiebreakers are needed.
If you don't mind SWAT or whatever your "mature" name is. I'd like older players to give out theyr opinions. Your comment brought 0 constructed arguments to the table.
+60 hours also don't amuse me.
The only reason why I would prefer Team domination or "king of the hill" is the fact that deadlock has no incentive to push. Which is easily exploitable if given more though.
Another argument would be that the matches would have a lot more consistent length. Interruptions (avoidable) would also cause a smaller impact.
We haven't tried it. At the very least we should have a test run?
Also, if possible, I think that it should be 5v5 and not 4v4. Just because it fits the maps perfectly IMO. Except Evac and Evac 2.... but 5v5 is pretty much perfect around the board.
However logistically 4v4 is probably best considering the competitive player base.
I know PMC would be interested, even with the bugs.